Friday, December 28, 2012

BSSC SACHIVALAYA SAHAYAK REVISED RESULT PUBLISHED


THOSE WHO FORGET ROLL NUMBER OF PT. EXAM. CLICK HERE FOR THEIR RESULT

CLICK HERE FOR BSSC CASE JUDGMENT 

MAINS EXAMINATION ON 27 JANUARY, 2013
APPLICATION LAST DATE: 17 JANUARY, 2013

CLICK HERE FOR MAINS EXAM SYLLABUS

CLICK HERE FOR MAINS FORM RELATED INFORMATION


CLICK HERE FOR ADDITIONAL RESULT OF BSSC FIRST GRADUATE LEVEL PRE. EXAM.

CLICK HERE FOR EXCISE SUB INSPECTOR FINAL RESULT
After a long wait, Bihar Staff Selection Commission (BSSC) has finally published the revised result. Total 27289 students have been declared successful in revised result which include earlier successful students. Honorable Patna High Court on 30 October, 2012, had rejected the bunch of petitions filled against result of first graduate level examination. But the Court had ordered not to fail those 935 students who were declared successful in preliminary result but were failing after revaluation of answer sheets. According to the Commission total 1415 new students succeeded in revaluation. But problem arose, when some candidates scores were equal or more than those candidates who were not in the passed list. To short out this problem Commission sought suggestion from General Administration department. In turn, General Department sought guidance from Department of Law. After more than one and half month, General Administration Department sent its suggestion to the Commission. One can say that BSSC might have avoided this delay. It should have sought suggestions from Bihar Public Service Commission, which had faced similar situation in 53-55th preliminary result. But BPSC declared the result within a week without seeking guidance from any departments.  Any way, successful students should now concentrate on mains examination which is the most important phase. 

4,922 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   1001 – 1200 of 4922   Newer›   Newest»
Unknown said...

Kya hayderabad se forencik report aa gayi hai aur usme s.a ka report positive paya gaya hai, kya ye bat sahi hai, please reply

XXX said...

SA ka forensic report positive hone ka kya arth hai?

Unknown said...

iska ye arth hua ki bad me OMR sheet ko rangane ki bat sahi payi gayi hai.

Unknown said...

Kya omr sheet rangne ki baat sahi hai, to abasya exam cancel hona chahiye. Agar dhandly sahi hai to court ko action lena chahiye.

Unknown said...

Today Patna High Court asked BSSC to what will the effect on merit list, if wrong questions are deleted. Next hearing on 20th March.

jag said...

Agar court ne fir effect of deletion puchha hai toh aaj ki case progress zero hui, ye question toh court ne bssc se pichhali bar 6 march ko hi puchha tha.aaj toh iska ans milna tha. Uf...its all waistage of our precious time....

Unknown said...

Yes its true, its all waistage of our precious time....

XXX said...

@arunjay ! Ye forensic report wali khabar apne kaha suni ?

Unknown said...

Blissji,
Mera ek friend jo ki patna me rahta hai, Usene ye news di, Par isai verify karne ki awashyakta hai.

jag said...

Forensic report waali baat mujhe kori afwah lagti hai. Ise abhi khandit Karen nahi toh ye jhuth gazab ki tezi se failegi. Bliss Ji....pls paste today's court order.

deepak bhattacharya said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
deepak bhattacharya said...

JAG JI...Forensic report waali baat PT EXAM ka hai IG CRIME BRANCH ne ye report court mai diya ye baat abhi maine dosto se suna hai...100 % sahi hai ye nhi kha sakta

Unknown said...

Today court has given last chance to bssc to file affidavit by 18 march as to the effect of deletion of 18 qn on merit list. It is also asked through an affidavit about the voilation of rules. Next hearing will resume on 20/03/13.
I think most probably the hearing will conclude on the date.

XXX said...

Webcopy of the Court Order will become available after 1-2 days. Then a more clear picture will emerge.

XXX said...

@Manoj ! Why the word LAST CHANCE? Is BSSC not cooperating with the Court? Which RULES have been violated?If you have any details , please share.

jag said...

Mere vichar se ab court ko tin kam karne chahiye....
1- bssc ko dissolve kare( ye agency apna strong room bhi protect nahi kar sakti.
2- saare appeared. Candidate's ki candidature cancel kare (ye exam me pass hone ya fail hone par exam ko cancel karane ke liye kisi had tak gir skate hain.)
3- sari SA sahit sabhi seton ko abhi BPSC ke result me add kar diya jaaye.( fir se selection process start karne par bahut Der hogi, tab tak officers ki Kami ke karan Bihar ke progress ko girvi kyon rakha jaye?)....
Note- I have not given bpsc .

Unknown said...

wo log jo court case kiya hai unhe jarur se ye point dalna chaya ki question out of syllabus pucha gaya hai aur ye BSSc ki mili bhaghat hai . Question advertisement ke anusar nahi pucha gaya hai so is point ko jadur se dele. jab BSSC ne Doroga ke samay ye kaha ker bahut ladka ko bahar ker diya tha ki wo more than one form bhade hai aur advertisement ko follow nahi ker raha hai. ye nazar BSSC ko is exam me koyaun nahi aaye isliye ki wo khud isme samail hai. so is point ko jadur se dala jaya aur exam ko rescheduled kiya jai. Taki sabhi ke sath fair ho....

Unknown said...

स्नातकस्तरीय परीक्षा को ले कर्मचारी चयन आयोग फिर तलब
Updated on: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:35 PM (IST)

-18 प्रश्नों को हटाने पर हो विचार : हाईकोर्ट

विधि संवाददाता, पटना

पटना हाईकोर्ट ने बिहार कर्मचारी चयन आयोग से स्नातक स्तरीय परीक्षा स्वयं संचालित नहीं किये जाने पर जवाब देने को कहा है। अदालत ने 20 मार्च तक आयोग से बताने को कहा कि बिहार राज्य संयुक्त प्रतियोगिता परीक्षा बोर्ड को स्नातकस्तरीय परीक्षा कराने का अधिकार किसने दे दिया? अदालत ने यह जानकारी तब मांगी जब आयोग ने अपने हलफनामे में परीक्षा संचालन के लिए बोर्ड को जिम्मेवार बताया।

अदालत ने यह भी जानकारी देने को कहा कि कुल 18 गलत प्रश्नों को हटा दिया जाए तो मेरिट लिस्ट पर क्या असर पड़ेगा? इन बातों की जानकारी न्यायाधीश मिहिर कुमार झा की पीठ ने मंगलवार को धनंजय कुमार व अन्य याचिकाओं की सुनवाई करते मांगी। याचिकाकर्ता के वकील दीनू कुमार का कहना था कि आयोग सिर्फ 11 प्रश्नों के हटाने पर अडिग है, जबकि कुल 18 प्रश्न गलत पाये गये हैं। उन्होंने कहा कि परीक्षा में धाधली के सवाल पर आयोग खामोश है। आर्थिक अपराध अनुसंधान इकाई ने माना है कि गड़बड़ी हुई है। पकड़े गये लड़कों ने स्वीकार किया कि किस प्रकार से वे पैसे लेकर प्रतियोगियों को मदद किया। इस सिलसिले में 17 लोग पकड़े भी गये थे जो बाद में छूट गए। सुनवाई के दौरान बताया गया कि नियमानुसार संयुक्त प्रतियोगिता परीक्षा बोर्ड मदद ली गयी थी। बोर्ड ने परीक्षा संचालित कराया था।

इस पर याचिकाकर्ता के वकील का कहना था कि रूल के अनुसार बोर्ड से आंशिक रूप से मदद ली जा सकती थी। न कि पूरी परीक्षा हवाले की जानी थी। मालूम हो कि स्नातक स्तरीय मुख्य परीक्षा के माध्यम से सचिवालय सहायक, उद्योग विस्तार पदाधिकारी, कनीय सांख्यिकी सहायक, आपूर्ति निरीक्षक,श्रम कल्याण पदाधिकारी, महिला समाज आयोजिका, सांख्यिकी संगणनक, एवं अनुसूचित जाति एवं जनजाति कल्याण पदाधिकारी की नियुक्ति की जानी है। कुल मिलाकर 1569 पदों को भरा जाना है।

Unknown said...

@bliss, bssc had to file its affidavit today but it cdn't. That is why the court has directed to file affdt positively failing which court may pass adverse order.
According to adv Dinu kumar the court has questioned about the violation of rules of bssc.

jag said...

Thnx Niraj ji 4 providing latest information....main janana chahata hun ki court 18 questions ko delete Kara kar kaun sa vivad samapt karna chahati hai. Clear hai 18 questions blindly delete karne se rank me bhari upar-fer hogi. Tab negatively affected log case nahi karenge kya? Achha hota court galat option waale Q ko delete karti aur galat answer waale question ko rectify karti. Court ka current formula case ko aur uljha dega.

XXX said...

Ye BOARD dwara exam conduct karane ka mamla kya hai?Has this exam been not conducted by BSSC? It seems whole matter is getting complicated day by day.

samyaksai said...

bhai aisa lag raha hai ki mamla ab bahut pechida ho gaya hai. agar 18 qs. delete hua to bahut gadbar ho jayegi. 18 qs to galat/dubious bhi nahi hai. if any of you have the list of 18 qs pls share. only god could understand the mess created by BSSC. it seems even BSSC is willing to let this exam get cancelled.

rakesh mani tripathi said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

पटना हाइकोर्ट ने राज्य कर्मचारी चयन आयोग को सचिवालय सहायक परीक्षा के 18 गलत सवालों को हटा कर परीक्षाफल निकालने की तैयारी करने को कहा है. मंगलवार को न्यायमूर्ति मिहिर कुमार झा ने धनंजय कुमार व अन्य की याचिका पर सुनवाई करते हुए यह निर्देश दिया. कोर्ट ने आयोग से विस्तृत जानकारी मांगी है. अब इस मामले की सुनवाई 20 मार्च को होगी. याचिकाकर्ता के वकील दीनू कुमार ने कोर्ट को बताया कि आयोग ने कुछ सवालों को अपने मन से हटा दिया. उनमें सही सवाल भी हटा दिये गये. उन्होंने उदाहरण के तौर पर कहा कि एक सवाल था मछली कहां रहती है? इसके उत्तर के विकल्प में पानी, हवा व जमीन था. इस सवाल को भी हटा दिया गया. कोर्ट ने आयोग से पूछा कि जब उसे ही सचिवालय व संलग्न कार्यालयों के लिए परीक्षा लेनी थी, तो कैसे हलफनामा कर दिया कि संयुक्त प्रतियोगिता परीक्षा बोर्ड से परीक्षा का आयोजन कराया गया. कोर्ट का तर्क था कि आयोग को किसने आदेश दिया कि वह बोर्ड से परीक्षा का आयोजन करवाये. प्रावधानों के मुताबिक बोर्ड से केवल कुछ सहायता लेनी थी. पूरी जिम्मेवारी कैसे सौंप दी. कोर्ट ने इन बातों का जवाब भी हलफनामे में देने को कहा है.

Unknown said...

Sir Ji Agar Kinhi ke pass wo 18 question malum hai to please share kigiy.............

XXX said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
XXX said...

BSSC is now saying (as per affidavit) that this exam has been conducted by BCECE BOARD. So BCECE should be held resposible for all the wrongdoings. What does this mean? How it can be so? Now it seems BSSC is only passing the buck,being unable to defend it's case in the Court. {According to BCECE website, ''Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board (BCECEB) is constituted under Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Act, 1995 . It conducts competitive examinations every year for admissions in various professional courses of Medical, Engineering and Agricultural streams in the Institutions of thestate of Bihar.'' }

arun said...

kisi ki 18 question pata to blog par likhe!

samyaksai said...

rakesh mani ji, aap newest par click karenge to latest comments aa jayega.

samyaksai said...

niraj ji, ab un candidates ka kya ho sakta hai jinka rank below 2000 hai. aur kya aapko pata hai kaun se 18 qs hai jinki charcha ho rahi hai

Unknown said...

jis tarah se bssc ne sabko mentally torture kiya hai ya kar raha hai aur kimti time barbaad kiya hai ya kar raha hai iske liye sabhi candidate mental compensation 1-1 lakh each dawa karna chahiye. Isse bssc swayam barbad ho jayega tab kisi ko koi sikayat nahi rahegi.

Unknown said...

Ho sakta hai ki court ye sochta ho ki 18 qu del karne ke baad list me jyada furk na padta ho to case me jyada dum nahi hai aur ise dissmiss karna chahiye.

jag said...

Lagta hai hum court order ko sahi perspective me nahi samajh rahe. Court ne 18 wrong nahi controversial questions ko delete karne nahi karke dekhane ko kaha hai ki result par asar padta hai ya nahi. Yadi nahi , toh court un 18 questions ko hatwa dega. Is tarah petitoner ki complain,bhi dur ho jaayegi aur pass candidates ko chedana bhi nahi padega. par court ko shayad ye pa ta nahi ki aasan sa dikhanewala ye formula bilkul flop hai. Jahan 1 marks par 100-150 candidates ki ranking change ho rahi hai wahan 18 question kya ulat- fer karenge sabko pata hai. Par bssc ne ye baat court ke saamane kyon nahi rakhi? Na hi 18 q ko hata koi list banakar diya, na hi un questions ke ans sudhare jiske liye court me uski khilli udai gayi . O come on man president-Secretary hoker bhi aaplogon ko itna nahi sujh raha Jo hum common mind waalo ko sujh rahi hai.....12 march se 20 march tak ki delay ka jimmewar sirf bssc hai. Tab tak humlogon ko apna tamasa bante dekhna hi hoga.

Unknown said...

You are ri8 Jag jee......

Nilesh said...

we have rights to know before any examination that from whom it will be conducted? Why BSSC has committed such a mistake after mistakes? what is going on in my bihar?

XXX said...

Jagji as per you ,the Court wants to know the impact of deleting 18Q on the merit list. Everyone knows that it was a highly cut-throat exam.So deleting 18 controversial questions will have a far-reaching effect on the merit list. So ultimately the Court will order cancellation of the exam.

XXX said...

The HC has only two options available in this case~ RE-EVALUATION or RE-EXAMINATION. There cannot be any third option. In the case of RE-EVALUATION, the Court should have ordered the BSSC to form an Expert Committee to rectify errors/anomalies (as in the PT case). But the Court is interested in knowing the impact of deleting those 18Q on the result. Obviously this exam is inching towards cancellation.The matter of BSSC vs. BCECEB has further complicated the whole issue.

jag said...

No bliss ji ...my point is that when every one know this is cut- throat competition why court don't know & asking a childish question. And if court is ignorent about it why bssc not explaining this? Jahan tak exam lene ki baat hai, exam legally liya ja raha hai ya nahi ye pata lagana examiner ka kam nahi hai. Exam ho jaane ke baad court ko istarah ke objections consider nahi karna tha......mai janta hun court kabhi aise decision nahi leti Jo dusare party ko objection karne ka mauka de. Ant me wahi hoga Jo pt me hua tha. Wrong Q delete aur wrong ans rectified honge. Par bssc ka nikammapan mamle ko khinchwa raha hai.

jag said...

Correction....read examinee.

Indian said...

Doston kya aapko nahi lagta ki BSSC ko sabhi set ka question bhi website par dalna chahiye, kyonki mujhe lagta hai issne merit list se fair candidates ko bahar karne ke liye alag alag question ke serial number ke sath hera pheri ki hai. ye hera pheri sabhi ladkon ke sath alag alag question ke sath 2-3 sawalon ke sath kiya gaya hai. Dhyan den ki question par sirf bar coding thi, koi series nahi thi. Doston ye bahut hi technical issue hai ,agar koi iss baat ko samajh rahen ho to plz court case se concern rakhne wale ladkon ko ye baat jaroor batayen...............

Unknown said...

Bcecb ke mudde me dum nahi hai , aayog apne suvida ke liye ye kadam utha sakta hai. Court me aayog eska bachav kar lega.bus fair exam ho , court bus yahi dekhega

jag said...

Dosto...ghabrao mat ..jis tarah rarest of the rare case me aadmi ko fansi hoti hai , usi tarah rarest of the rare case me exam ko cancell kiya jata hai.......re-evaluation hoga ....ans rectify karne ke order aayenge, 20 tak wait kar lo . Pura mamla khatm hone me march toh beetega hi. Cancellation ke saare argument illogical hai. Aayog apne kaam ke liye kai agencies ki help leti hai. Question koi aur taiyar karta hai, ans koi aur agency check karti hai. Even bssc ki site bhi koi aur maintain karta hai. Ab koi kahe ki bssc ye saare kam khud kyon nahi karti toh aapko bhi illogical lagega ya nahi.

XXX said...

Jagji but still the moot point is~ WHY IS THE COURT INTERESTED IN KNOWING THE IMPACT OF DELETION OF '' NOT LESS THAN 18Q '' ON THE RESULT.

jag said...

Bliss ji.
It seems u r not reading all coments. Pls see the coments surjeshwar @05:05pm & jag @05:10 pm.

XXX said...

The issue of BSSC vs BCECEB has cropped up due to violation of certain rules by the BSSC. Now BSSC will have to justify it's stand before the Court. If the Court will be satisfied by BSSC's reply,there will be no problem.

jag said...

As far as less or more concern that is because exact 18 q have been objected by petitioners.

Unknown said...

Mr. Jug, It is not as simple as you r saying. Never before in the history, any commission had said that since it didn't conducted examination, hence responsibilities lies with others. Have u ever heard from BPSC or UPSC or UPPSC or JPSC that wrong lies with the other boards or any body else. If bssc can not take responsibilities of wrongdoings of examination and blame it for bcece, then is utter ridiculous. If bcece is responsible then why BSSC was constituted. It is grave breach of law. It is not as simple as u think. It also means that BSSC has accepted in the court that mistakes were committed that is why it is now blaming bcece. If BSSC can reject any application on the basis of not following law then it has to be also penalizes for wrongdoings. As far as rarest of rare is concerned, capital punishment is still there. If you can give 12 bonus points for wrong questions then why not in mains examination. A lot of questions have to be answered.

XXX said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
XXX said...

Jagji those 18Q includes many such questions which have been already corrected by the BSSC.Then why is this no. 18 and not less.My point is the HC Judges are not so naive as to be misled by anyone.We cannot doubt their wisdom.They know quite well the nature of today's competitive exams.They cannot ask silly and childish questions. If the Court is interested in knowing something,there must be some reason behind it. Just try to read the mind of the Court. (I do have read those comments).

Unknown said...

Ye v ho sakta hai ki 18 qu del hone par list me agar bada antar aaye to court 18 qu ke liye alag se janch karwane ko kah sakti hai.aur uske anusar hi merit list fir se banane ko kah sakti hai.

Unknown said...

Surjeshwarji apki bat sahi ho aisa mai bhi asha karta hoon kyonki court ko aisa lagta hai ki 18 Q ko delete karne par merit list par jyada fark nahi padega. Sath hi usne result ke prakashan ki tyari karne ko kaha hai result publish karne ko nahi kaha hai. Justified decision nahi hone par sc ke liye rasta khul jayega jiska mauka koi lower court nahi dena chahta.
Hamare pas court order ki copy to nahi hai hum sirf paper tv ya blog ke news par vishleshan kar rahe hai. Mai bhi councelling ki 2nd list ka intzar kar raha tha lekin bcece aur forensik ka mudda sath hi sath bssc ke nikammepan ne raat ki nind aur din ka chain chhin liya hai. Krishna bhagwan ka kahna yad rakhe jo hota hai achha hota hai jo hoga achha hoga.

jag said...

Mr Niraj ...more discussion will proove futile. We r not spotspectators. Time will tell the truth. Let's wait & watch till 20.

Unknown said...

Ab to exam cancel hon hi chahiye. Kyoki Bssc ne pahle kaha tha ki exam me koi dhandly nahi huee hai. ab kah raha hai bcece ne exam conduct kiya hai. what is this , Court must take action against this big scam. jo abhi tak is baat par jor de raha hai ki exam cancel nahi hoga , wo copurt ke anewale decision se ghabraye hue hai, only bssc is responsibile for this fault. Bihar govt must dismsiss the bssc and furnish the new comission for taking fress exam.

Unknown said...

2006 ke JE exam jo cancell ho gaya tha ke upper SC ne safal longo ke paksh me faisla diya hai, wah v hamare tarah ka hi case tha.Ab itna to tay hai ki exam cancell nahi hoga, aap log aaj ka hindustan 6-7 dekh le.

XXX said...

Webcopy of 12th March Court Order~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3640 of 2013====================================================== Dhananjay Kumar & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The Bihar State Selection Com .... .... Respondent/s====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4265 of 2013====================================================== Niraj Kumar Kantha & Ors ........ Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3740 of 2013====================================================== Arun Kumar & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4104 of 2013====================================================== Santosh Kumar & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5103 of 2013====================================================== Ajay Kumar & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The Bihar Staff Selection Commission & Ors.... .... Respondent/s====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
5
12-03-2013
Heard counsel for the parties. While learned counsel for the petitioners are of the view
Patna High Court CWJC No.3640 of 2013 (5) dt.12-03-2013
2
that the matter should be heard expeditiously, Mr. Jitendra Singh,learned counsel for the Commission, submits that the exercise in view of the earlier order of this Court dated 6.3.2013 is being made and the Commission will come out with the stand in a week. He has, accordingly, prayed that these cases should be listed on 20th March, 2013. List all these cases accordingly on 20th March, 2013 at the top of the list under the heading ¡®for Admission-I¡¯. Thepleadings, however, must be complete on or before 18th March, 2013.
(Mihir Kumar Jha, J)

XXX said...

As per this Order, date was extended on the plea of BSSC because it was not ready with the reply.

XXX said...

Again no mention of ~ (1) Issue of deletion of 18Q. (2) Issue of BCECEB. It seems these webcopies are in abridged form, not containing full details.

Unknown said...

2006 ke JE exam jo cancell ho gaya tha ke upper SC ne safal longo ke paksh me faisla diya hai, wah v hamare tarah ka hi case tha.Ab itna to tay hai ki exam cancell nahi hoga, aap log aaj ka hindustan 6-7 dekh le.

jag said...

SurjeshwR ji ..Maine kaha na is tarah ki problem me exam cancell nahi hote. Par bahut log cancellation ki ummid me bhi hai. Pls unke ummid ko bhi bane rahane ki gunjayish chhod dijiye. Is blog ka maja tabhi hai jab dono party yahaan rahe.bliss ji ....court dwara not less than 18 q ka demand is liye hai kyon ki petiotioner ne un q ko exempt nahi kiya jinhe bssc ne sudhar diya tha.

XXX said...

There are hundreds of such SC/HC Rulings already available. These Rulings are not applied blindly in individual cases.

jag said...

But hundred of ndividual cases ki pairvi in Hc/sc ki rulings par ki jati hai. In fact inhe apne paksh me faisale ke liye strong evidence mana jata hai, aur isi karan Hc/sc ko abhilekh nyayalya mana jata hai. However mai kamna karunga, let everyone hopes alive.

deepak bhattacharya said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
XXX said...

Both SC/HC being regarded as the Court of Records,their Rulings have evidentiary value.But these Rulings can be applied in individual cases only if the two cases are VERY MUCH SIMILAR in nature.This is something to be decided by the Court. In the JE Case, the SC has orderded that ........''punarmulyankan ke bad jo merit list me nahi ayege unhe bahar nahi kiya jayga''. This is not possible in the SE Case as no appointment/posting has been done by the BSSC.

XXX said...

@Jagji 6.23pm....On the issue of deletion of 18Q,you are still not to the point.

XXX said...

@10.02 comment ~Read SA Case.

jag said...

Bliss ji..@10:02 no appointment/posting has been done but selection & councelling has been done. Now Hc/sc will protect there interest as in the JE case.....on 18Questions row , ab toh ek gazal hi yaad aati hai ...ya rab wo samjhe hain na samjhenge meri bat, de aur dil unko Jo na de mujhko juban aur....itni simple si chiz nahi samajh pa rahe ki questions ki list petitioner dwara bssc ke rectified ans ko neglect kar ke Di gai hai.

Unknown said...

BSSC ke paas abhi 5000 se jyada jagah khali hai , usne matra 3000 ya kuch aur ke liye hi list jari ki hai..ho sakta hai wo naye list aur purane list dono ko milakar ek alag hi list jari kar de.

XXX said...

Thanks for your counter-view. Without these views/counter-views ,this blog might have become a very dull, dry and drab plateform. Keep it up. I will keep blogging in favour of the Petitioners.@Jagji.

XXX said...

Surajeshwarji.... aap sahi ho sakte hai. Par aap kis context me ye bat kah rahe hai?

jag said...

@12:52 bliss ji...thnx and I will keep opposing favourism.

FIGHTER said...

Any one has true information about the list of question demand for deletion. if any please share it at this platform

FIGHTER said...

BSSC responsible for all malpractices in all recent examination conducted by bssc.
Recently Bssc conducted the Auditor examination he has done so many mistake initially not released the syllabus of the examination both mathematics and commerce graduate are eligible for the examination Bssc set the difficult question for the mathematics and very eassy question for the commerce . After the publication result it only commerce student get selected only 3% math background student get selected.Bssc totally respounsible for that he even could not understant/know the how the recuitment processes can be handle.
same procedure adopted S.A examination wrorng question same examination conducted in jharkhand either no wrong question/1 or 2 question. govt/H.C sould take the strong action against this consitutional agency and its chairman sould be responsible for that.

raj said...

21 march ko bssc ko highcourt ko batana hai ki strongroom ka tala tutne and OMR sheet me ki gayi cherchar ke baad bssc ne kya karwai ki.

raj said...

21 march ko bssc ko highcourt ko batana hai ki strongroom ka tala tutne and OMR sheet me ki gayi cherchar ke baad bssc ne kya karwai ki.

XXX said...

21 or 20 March ?

raj said...

20 ko to alag date hai 21 ko alag case ka date hai

raj said...

20 ko question delete ke matter par jawab dena hai and 21 ko strongroom ke tala tutne and omr sheet me cherchar ke matter par jawab dena hai

XXX said...

Can you give Case no.? If not, kindly tell the source of information.

raj said...

Aaj maine etv bihar par suna..advocate dinu kumar bata rahe the..unhonr hi bataya ki 21 march ko bssc ko jawab dena hai..strongroom matter par..it is a confirm news bcz maine khud suna hai and 20 march ko kya matter hai wo bhi mujhe pata hai and rumour spread karna meri aadat nahi hai..bpsc wale blog me bhi aap sathi mitra ka coment padh sakte hai.bpsc ka bhi aaj matter tha jo 2 april ko chala gaya hai.usme wo bata raha tha ki aaj mihir jha bssc ke case ko lekar bhaut jhunjhalaye hue the

XXX said...

Thanks 4 reply. I have read that comment by Mitra.

jag said...

20...21....02april....Etv...dinu...bpsc ki hearing ke dauran judge sahab junjhalaye bssc ke liye....sathi mitra ne judge ki pshycology padh Li ....raj mai toh yahi kahunga ...isharon ko agar samjho , raj ko raj rahane do.

Unknown said...

Raj ji kuch ka kuch dekh ke bol rahe hai.

Unknown said...

Raj ji aapne galat news dekha hai.

Unknown said...

21 ka case JE exam 2012 se related hai na ki SA se ,bhram me na rahe . . . Na hi failaye.

XXX said...

It seems today something related with SA Case has happened in the HC , otherwise Sathi Mitra (an active member of BPSC Blog) might not have referred to it. It might be a case related with SA PT Exam which is being heard by a double bench.This is what Sathi Mitra has posted......''Aaj court me kuchh vishesh nahi hua hai.....Mihir ji ne BPSC se sawal kiye ki aaplogo ne AC service ki seat ko kyun shamil kiya?Espar BPSC ka jawab tha ki unhone aawshayak sansodhano ke sath badlaw kiya hai....Jab Judge saahab ne punh BPSC se puchha ki aapne jab AC service ko general kiya to es se sambandhit sabhi kagjat jama karen...BPSC ne aaj espar asmarthata jatai.
Agali hearing ka date 22 April kodiya ja raha tha par us din Bihar diwas hone ke karan punh 2 April kar diya gaye.HC ke sutron ke anusar es case me koe dam nhi hai agar BPSC aaj hi paper lekar gayi hoti to sara mamla khatm ho jata...aisi puri aasha hai ki 2 aApril ko pura mamla rafa -dafa ho jayega aur yah v ho sakta hai ki AC service ke 100 seat na hate.Punh ak bat AC searvice ke alawe kisi v anay badhi hue seat ko lekar case nahihai....esliye ghabrane ki jarurat nahi hai......main samsya sachiwalay sahayak ke exam ko lekar tha AUR Judge mahoday us case ko lekar jhunjhlayen hue the....sachiwalaye sahayak ka mamla ab fanste ja raha hai.''

jag said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
sanjay verma said...

Still abhi kayi galti G.S mai bhi hai
Q NO-60. The number of primary alcoholic groups in glycerol is
(A) 3 (B) 4 (C) 2 (D) 0
the given Answer is C
but correct answer is A
source:-Glycerol is the common name of the organic compound whose chemical structure is HOCH2-CHOHCH2OH. Propane-1,2,3-triol or glycerin (USP), as it is also called, consists of a chain of three carbon atoms with each of the end carbon atoms bonded to two hydrogen atoms (C-H) and a hydroxyl group (-OH) and the central carbon atom is bonded to a hydrogen atom (C-H) and a hydroxyl group (-OH). Glycerol is a trihydric alcohol because it contains three hydroxyl or alcohol groups. Glycerin is a thick liquid with a sweet taste that is found in fats and oils and is the primary triglyceride found in coconut and olive oil. It was discovered in 1779, when the Swedish chemist Carl Wilhelm Scheele (1742-1786) washed glycerol out of a heated a mixture of lead oxide (PbO) and olive oil. Today, it is obtained as a byproduct from the manufacture of soaps.

YOU CAN CHEEK IN ANY ORGANIC CHEMISTRY BOOK

http://science.jrank.org/pages/3065/Glycerol.html#ixzz2NdrW1OvP
69. Which technique has been possible only after development of recombinant DNA
technology ?
correct answer is (B) Monoclonal antibody production
because vacination has discoverd in
1796 by Edward jenner
but this question asked the thing that only possible after the invention of recombinant DNA.so
if question having the option Haptatus B vacination then this is correct answer.
Q No-82. The largest beach in India is in
The only the correct answer is
(C) Tamil Nadu
there question must br re-evalulate by the epert commettee .
so high court must set -up a expert commettee to re-evaluate all question in each set either in hindi or english so that student get benefit on technical ground every one get natural justice.

XXX said...

You are doing wrong interpretation of Mitra's post. He has nowhere used the word ....PICHCHLE DINO JHELANE SE. This incident is related with today's hearing. Tomorrow I will request Mitra to give some more details.@Jagji.gdni8.

jag said...

Mr sanjay verma
AAP Der se aaye par durust nahi aaye. CH2OH- primary alcoholic group , CHOH- secendory alcoholic group , COH - tertiary alcoholic group kahalata hai. Ab aap hi bataiye glycerol CH2OH-CHOH-CH2OH me kitane primary OH group hai? Only two . Tisra group secendory hai. Bhai sahab question most tricky oneliner the, inhe halke me mat lijiye. Achhe-achhon ki khat khadi kar rakhi hai is question set ne.

jag said...

Bliss ji@02:44
Pls request one thing more bliss ji, not to mix personal views while reporting court hearing.

Unknown said...

परीक्षा रद्द करें

हाइकोर्ट ने बिहार कर्मचारी चयन आयोग को जूनियर इंजीनियर बहाली में कथित रूप से धांधली के मामले को गंभीरता से लिया है. कोर्ट ने आयोग के अध्यक्ष को निर्देश दिया कि स्वयं परीक्षा को रद्द करें, अन्यथा कोर्ट उसकी न्यायिक जांच करवायेगा. रविभूषण कुमार शर्मा व अन्य की याचिका पर सुनवाई करते हुए न्यायमूर्ति मिहिर कुमार झा के पीठ ने कहा कि अपराध अनुसंधान इकाई ने गड.बड.ियों को लेकर प्राथमिकी दर्ज की गयी है. आठ जून, 2011 को 1988 सिविल व 42 मैकेनिकल इंजीनियरों की नियुक्ति के लिए विज्ञापन निकाला गया था. 20 अक्तूबर, 2012 को इस मामले में एफआइआर की गयी थी. इसमें 17 लड.के भी पकडे. गये थे और उन्होंने स्वीकार किया था कि परीक्षा में धांधली हुई है. ओएमआर शीट में हेराफेरी की गयी है. अपराध अनुसंधान इकाई के एसपी ने भी इस बात को स्वीकार किया था कि स्ट्रांग रूम के ताले के साथ छेड.छाड. की गयी थी. इसके अलावा इकाई द्वारा अनियमितता भी पकड.ी गयी जिसकी जांच चल रही है.

Unknown said...

परीक्षा रद्द करें

हाइकोर्ट ने बिहार कर्मचारी चयन आयोग को जूनियर इंजीनियर बहाली में कथित रूप से धांधली के मामले को गंभीरता से लिया है. कोर्ट ने आयोग के अध्यक्ष को निर्देश दिया कि स्वयं परीक्षा को रद्द करें, अन्यथा कोर्ट उसकी न्यायिक जांच करवायेगा. रविभूषण कुमार शर्मा व अन्य की याचिका पर सुनवाई करते हुए न्यायमूर्ति मिहिर कुमार झा के पीठ ने कहा कि अपराध अनुसंधान इकाई ने गड.बड.ियों को लेकर प्राथमिकी दर्ज की गयी है. आठ जून, 2011 को 1988 सिविल व 42 मैकेनिकल इंजीनियरों की नियुक्ति के लिए विज्ञापन निकाला गया था. 20 अक्तूबर, 2012 को इस मामले में एफआइआर की गयी थी. इसमें 17 लड.के भी पकडे. गये थे और उन्होंने स्वीकार किया था कि परीक्षा में धांधली हुई है. ओएमआर शीट में हेराफेरी की गयी है. अपराध अनुसंधान इकाई के एसपी ने भी इस बात को स्वीकार किया था कि स्ट्रांग रूम के ताले के साथ छेड.छाड. की गयी थी. इसके अलावा इकाई द्वारा अनियमितता भी पकड.ी गयी जिसकी जांच चल रही है.

Unknown said...

परीक्षा रद्द करें

हाइकोर्ट ने बिहार कर्मचारी चयन आयोग को जूनियर इंजीनियर बहाली में कथित रूप से धांधली के मामले को गंभीरता से लिया है. कोर्ट ने आयोग के अध्यक्ष को निर्देश दिया कि स्वयं परीक्षा को रद्द करें, अन्यथा कोर्ट उसकी न्यायिक जांच करवायेगा. रविभूषण कुमार शर्मा व अन्य की याचिका पर सुनवाई करते हुए न्यायमूर्ति मिहिर कुमार झा के पीठ ने कहा कि अपराध अनुसंधान इकाई ने गड.बड.ियों को लेकर प्राथमिकी दर्ज की गयी है. आठ जून, 2011 को 1988 सिविल व 42 मैकेनिकल इंजीनियरों की नियुक्ति के लिए विज्ञापन निकाला गया था. 20 अक्तूबर, 2012 को इस मामले में एफआइआर की गयी थी. इसमें 17 लड.के भी पकडे. गये थे और उन्होंने स्वीकार किया था कि परीक्षा में धांधली हुई है. ओएमआर शीट में हेराफेरी की गयी है. अपराध अनुसंधान इकाई के एसपी ने भी इस बात को स्वीकार किया था कि स्ट्रांग रूम के ताले के साथ छेड.छाड. की गयी थी. इसके अलावा इकाई द्वारा अनियमितता भी पकड.ी गयी जिसकी जांच चल रही है.

deepak bhattacharya said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

पटना हाईकोर्ट ने बिहार कर्मचारी चयन आयोग के अध्यक्ष से कहा कि वह कनीय अभियंताओं की परीक्षा रद करें नहीं तो न्यायिक जांच के आदेश दिये जाएंगे। अध्यक्ष को यह बताने को कहा गया है कि गड़बडि़यों का खुलासा होने के बाद और क्या कार्रवाई हुई? जानकारी 21 मार्च तक मांगी गई है। दरअसल, अपराध अनुसंधान ईकाई ने सचिवालय सहायक सहित अनेक प्रकार परीक्षा में गड़बडि़यों को लेकर 20 अक्टूबर को प्राथमिकी दर्ज की थी। जांच में पता चला कि स्ट्रांग रूम के ताले के साथ छेड़छाड़ हुई थी। ओएमआर सीट में हेराफेरी की गई है। अदालत अब जानना चाहती है कि धांधलियों की शिकायत मिलने के बाद भी रिजल्ट किस प्रकार से प्रकाशित कर दिये गये। जल संसाधन विभाग में 1988 सिविल व 42 यांत्रिक जूनियर इंजीनियर की बहाली के लिए 8 जून 2011 को विज्ञापन निकाला गया था। इसमें करीब 8000 अभ्यर्थियों की 30 सितंबर को लिखित परीक्षा हुई थी और 21 जनवरी को रिजल्ट निकाल दिया गया। मामले पर न्यायाधीश मिहिर कुमार झा की पीठ ने राजीव रंजन, रविभूषण कुमार व अन्य की याचिकाओं पर सुनवाई की। आवेदक के वकील दीनू कुमार ने आरोप लगाया कि प्राथमिकी दर्ज होने के बाद आयोग को संभल जाना चाहिए था। लेकिन हेराफेरी में पकड़े गये आवेदकों को भी सफल घोषित कर दिया गया। चौंकाने वाली बात यह रही कि घटना के तुरंत बाद लंबित परीक्षाओं का परिणाम निकलना शुरू हो गया। सचिवालय सहायक परीक्षा का परिणाम 27 जनवरी को, अंकेक्षक का परिणाम 22 फरवरी को, प्रर्वतन निरीक्षक का परीक्षा का परिणाम 26 फरवरी को, उत्पाद निरीक्षक परीक्षा का परिणाम 21 फरवरी को और जूनियर इंजीनियर का रिजल्ट 21 को प्रकाशित कर दिया गया। रद हो सकती है कनीय अभियंताओं की परीक्षा

jag said...

Comment@ 10:17,18,39
1- ye kis date ki hearing hai ?
2- FIR 20 Oct ko hui,result 21 Jan ko declare hua, kya three month ka gap ke baad nikale Gaye result ko turant nikala gaya result kaha jayega?
3-court agar confirm hai toh nyayik janch karane ki baat kyon karegi.
4-kya omr hera-pheri ka mamla SA ka nahi hai JE ka hai?.......

Unknown said...

YE news Dainik jagaran e paper me hai. Nyayik janch hone se adhyaksh aur sachiw par bhi mamla ban sakta hai. jis dauran strong room me omr heraferi hone ka case darj hai us dauran je ke sath sachiwalay, pravartan awar nirikshak aur utpad nirikshak pariksha bhi daire me aa raha hai. inme bhi herfer ki pusti hui hai.

XXX said...

Court's WARNING to the BSSC's Chairman in JE case : Either cancel the exam yourself or the Court will order a Judicial Enquiry. No doubt BSSC is now in trouble. It is not a good omen for the SA exam .The Countdown has just begun.

XXX said...

Such severe strictures are rarely passed by Courts against the head of responsible institutions.Now Bssc has lost all it's credibility. The Chairman of the BSSC must resign immediately.

XXX said...

Nirajji kak yani 15 March ko HC me SA exam se sambandhit kaun sa bahas hua hai? Iski charcha Sathi Mitraji ne bhi BPSC ke blog par ki hai. Agar apko koi jankari ho to kindly share karen.

deepak bhattacharya said...


jag ji 1;47 ye mamla sirf JE ka nhi...bssc ne abhi jitne bhi exam liye hai oosh sab exam par ye mamla hai......BLISS JI strongroom ke tala tutne and omr sheet me cherchar ka matter, PT EXAM KA WRONG QUESTION, 10000 EXTRA RESULT KA.....Judge mihir JHA KE COURT MAI EK ALAG CASE HUA THA OOSH KA HI CASE 15 MARCH KO HUA HAI

XXX said...

Thanks Deepakji. Do you know the Case no. ?

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
XXX said...

Coding-decoding kya karte ho , jo kahana hai clear bolo.

jag said...

Cancell ho, na ho, meri dono me banti hai.....main roun ya hasunnnnnn, karun main kya karunnnnnnnnnn......

Unknown said...

few belive they are not in the merit list of mains exam conducted in 2013 & result decleared in 2013 because strong room lock was broken in 2012..
..strange way to convince themselves and others..

Nilesh said...

You can check the difference between previous and new ans posted by BSSC. After checking I got 12 nos of answer are different (including deleted question). How can anybody say it will not impact on merit list? It will be massive impact for merit change. Strong room matter is under court but it is in front of you. please check it

jag said...

To setank suman ji
Bahut Dino baad ...achha laga. Aapki baat sahi hai , dhandhali pt me hui, saja mains waalon ko bhugatne ko kaha ja raha hai....aur bataiye hum looseron ke comment abhi bhi aaplog padhate ho kya...facebook ke band kamre me achievers kya discuss kar rahe hain.mujhe dar hai kahin achievers , loosers na ban jaye & vice-versa.do visit us.

deepak bhattacharya said...

BLISS JI case no. CWJC-3429/2013 hai...dekh lijye

deepak bhattacharya said...

As on- 16/3/2013
Present Status of case ( CWJC-3429/2013 ):
Case No.: CWJC-3429/2013 Bench:
Filed on: 18 Feb 2013 District: Vaishali
Ravi Bhushan Kumar & Anr
Vs.
The Bihar Staff Selection Commission & Ors Subject:
P.S.Case No.:
Lower Court:
FOR ADMISSION I 15 Mar 2013->ADJOURNED -> 21 Mar 2013

Petitioner's Advocate: Shiw Kumar Prabhakar
Respondent Advocate: SANJAY KR NO.1 Pending ......
In the Court of: Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha
FOR ADMISSION I (AT 15:15) BEFORE :- Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha
Listed After/Before -> 1 Cases.
Please ensure the serial number from Daily Cause list

deepak bhattacharya said...

Present Status of case ( CWJC-3740/2013 ):
Case No.: CWJC-3740/2013 Bench:
Filed on: 20 Feb 2013 District: Sitamarhi
Arun Kumar & Ors
Vs.
The State Of Bihar & Ors Subject:
P.S.Case No.:
Lower Court:
FOR ADMISSION I 12 Mar 2013->ADJOURNED -> 20 Mar 2013

Petitioner's Advocate: Abhinav Srivastava
Respondent Advocate: NAMRTA MISHRA Pending ......
In the Court of: Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha
FOR ADMISSION I (AT 10:30) BEFORE :- Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha
Listed After/Before -> 290 Cases.
Please ensure the serial number from Daily Cause list

deepak bhattacharya said...

resent Status of case ( CWJC-3640/2013 ):
Case No.: CWJC-3640/2013 Bench:
Filed on: 19 Feb 2013 District: Saharsa
Dhananjay Kumar & Ors
Vs.
The Bihar State Selection Commission & Ors Subject:
P.S.Case No.:
Lower Court:
FOR ADMISSION I 12 Mar 2013->ADJOURNED -> 20 Mar 2013

Petitioner's Advocate: Shiw Kumar Prabhakar
Respondent Advocate: RAJESH KUMAR Pending ......
In the Court of: Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha
FOR ADMISSION I (AT 10:30) BEFORE :- Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha
Listed After/Before -> 5 Cases.
Please ensure the serial number from Daily Cause list

deepak bhattacharya said...

bliss ji.... ye 3 case hai jo muje pata hai

deepak bhattacharya said...

swetank suman ji aap ne sayad aaj ka danik jagran nhi dekha मामले पर न्यायाधीश मिहिर कुमार झा की पीठ ने राजीव रंजन, रविभूषण कुमार व अन्य की याचिकाओं पर सुनवाई की। आवेदक के वकील दीनू कुमार ने आरोप लगाया कि प्राथमिकी दर्ज होने के बाद आयोग को संभल जाना चाहिए था। लेकिन हेराफेरी में पकड़े गये आवेदकों को भी सफल घोषित कर दिया गया.....

XXX said...

Thanks Deepakji.

Unknown said...

thanks JAG ji for remembering me....
I do confess that i visit this blog everyday... but refrain from commenting...
Moreover Belive it or not it is ur comments which kept me glued to this blog.. The best of you is U criticise the wrong and appreciate the good..

An achiver will always be an achiver if he had not adopted unfair means to succeed... he do not fear from re-exam, re-evaluation .. However he fear from time being wasted in all these process...

Unknown said...

deepak bhattacharya ji ( March 16, 2013 at 10:15 PM )
i fail to interpret what you want to say plz elaborate....

XXX said...

Swetankji keep posting your comments on this blog. You can enjoy BSSC MAHA- LEELA here much better than on FB where most of our friends seem suffering from self-righteous complacency and ostrich-like-approach.

jag said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
XXX said...

Can anyone on this blog clear one of my doubts ~ Why did BSSC change the Roll No. of candidates in the SA MAIN Exam ? Was not it an unconventional step? I am raising this question because LIKE CAESAR'S WIFE , BSSC MUST BE ABOVE SUSPICION.

XXX said...

Can anyone on this blog clear one of my doubts ~ Why did BSSC not disclose any details of 11000 additional PT result ? I am raising this question because LIKE CAESAR'S WIFE , BSSC MUST BE ABOVE SUSPICION.

XXX said...

Can anyone on this blog clear one of my doubts ~ Why have BSSC's Experts not been able to rectify errors in the answerkey despite their best efforts ? Does not it seem to be a deliberate action on their part? After all they are Experts. I am raising this question because LIKE CAESAR'S WIFE , BSSC MUST BE ABOVE SUSPICION.

jag said...

Bliss ji
Yes someone on this blog clear ur doubts....but first u have to clear his one dout.....what is connection between doubt & roll no change? Why not asked to give detail of 11000 extra result before mains. As far as idiom conscern for ur knowledge julieus caesars wife was not above suspicion, pompeia was under suspicion for adultery with pubilus & Caesars was had proof for it but he not produced it saying ceasars wife is above suspicion. Here in present pretext for cynics I will say bssc must be above suspicion....
Ur third point is too above suspicion....thnx

XXX said...

I am not asking the meaning of this old classical maxim ~ CAESAR'S WIFE MUST BE ABOVE SUSPICION.

XXX said...

''Caesar's wife must be above suspicion''.
MEANING ~ The associates of public figures must not even be suspected of wrongdoing. {The ancient Roman Julius Caesar is supposed to have said this when asked why he divorced his wife, Pompeia.Because she was suspected of some wrongdoing, he could not associate with her anymore}.Examples~Jill: I don't think the mayor is trustworthy; his brother was charged with embezzlement. Jane: But the charges were never proved. Jill: That doesn't matter. Caesar's wife must be above suspicion. When the newspapers reported the rumor that the lieutenant governor had failed to pay his taxes, the governor forced him to resign, saying, "Caesar's wife must be above suspicion."

XXX said...

Your replies to my doubts are quite evading and ambigous.Thanks.

XXX said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
XXX said...

Can anyone on this blog clear one of my doubts ~Why have Criminal Cases and Writs been filed in four exams ( JE+ESI+AUDITOR+SA ) conducted by BSSC during the last six months? Is it a mere coincidence? I am raising this question because LIKE CAESAR'S WIFE , BSSC MUST BE ABOVE SUSPICION.

rakesh mani tripathi said...

bihar, supreme court, patna high court,
ssc, job, सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने बिहार में सात वर्ष पहले
आयोजित
की गई राज्य कर्मचारी चयन आयोग (एसएससी)
की परीक्षा में सही और गलत, दोनों जवाब देने वाले
अभ्यर्थियों को नौकरी पर रखने का आदेश दिया है।
साथ ही नए सिरे से परीक्षा कराने के हाईकोर्ट के आदेश
को रद्द भी कर दिया है। गौरतलब है कि अगस्त, 2006
बिहार में जूनियर
इंजीनियर की 220 पोस्ट के लिए राज्य
कर्मचारी चयन आयोग ने परीक्षा कराई थी। मूल्यांकन में
हुई गड़बड़ी के कारण परीक्षा में गलत उत्तर देने वाले
अभ्यर्थियों को नौकरी पर रख लिया गया और
सही उत्तर देने वाले नौकरी से वंचित रह गए। इस मामले में
दाखिल एक याचिका में हाईकोर्ट ने राज्य
सरकार को सभी पदों पर नए सिरे से परीक्षा कराने
का आदेश दिया था।
हालांकि, अब सर्वोच्च अदालत ने परीक्षा के बाद
जूनियर इंजीनियर नियुक्त हुए गलत जवाब देने
वालों को नौकरी से न हटाने का आदेश दिया है। साथ
ही सही जवाब देने वालों को भी नियुक्ति करने
का निर्देश दिया है।
सर्वोच्च अदालत ने गलत जवाब देने के बावजूद
नौकरी पाने वाले अभ्यर्थियों की ओर से दायर
याचिकाओं को स्वीकार करते हुए कहा कि वैकल्पिक
प्रश्नों के जवाब में तैयार की गई उत्तर पुस्तिका में सही के
स्थान पर गलत उत्तर लिखे जाने की भूल के चलते
यह परेशानी खड़ी हुई।
इसमें गलत और सही जवाब देने वाले अभ्यर्थी पूरी तरह से
निर्दोष हैं क्योंकि इस मामले में कोई
भी अनियमितता या धोखाधड़ी नहीं की गई। लेकिन
उत्तर-पुस्तिका में भूलवश गड़बड़ी होने से गलत जवाब देने
वाले अभ्यर्थियों को नौकरी के लिए चुन लिया गया,
जबकि सही जवाब देने वाले दुर्भाग्य से बाहर हो गए।
जस्टिस टीएस ठाकुर की अध्यक्षता वाली पीठ ने
बिहार में अगस्त 2006 में हुई राज्य कर्मचारी चयन
आयोग की परीक्षा में पटना हाईकोर्ट की ओर से
जारी आदेश को दरकिनार कर दिया है। हाईकोर्ट ने राज्य
सरकार को सभी पदों पर नए सिरे से
परीक्षा कराने का आदेश दिया था।
पीठ ने कहा है कि सात साल पहले 220 पदों पर जूनियर
इंजीनियर नियुक्त किए जा चुके
परीक्षार्थियों को हटाया जाना उचित नहीं होगा।
लेकिन सही जवाब देने वाले उन
परीक्षार्थियों को भी नियुक्ति किया जाए
जो उत्तर पुस्तिका की गलती की वजह से बाहर हो गए
थे।
कोर्ट ने एसएससी को तीन माह
भर्ती प्रक्रिया पूरा करने का आदेश दिया ह

XXX said...

In the JE Exam 2012 Case , the Chairman of BSSC is in a Catch-22 situation. The Court's strict order to the Chairman is ~ Either Cancel the Exam Yourself OR Face Judicial Enquiry. If he cancel the exam himself, it will mean he is accepting that BSSC is involved in criminal acts. If he does not cancel the exam, a Judicial Enquiry will be ordered which might have more serious consequences , even arrest of the Chairman and the Secretary.

jag said...

I think bssc is in cornelian dilemma. But ek baat hai, bssc ka lawyer court ko sahi tarah se jawab nahi de pa raha hai. 18 question ka deletion effect jaanane par adi court ko kya wo bata nahi sakta tha ki jahan 1 mark par 100 ki ranking effected ho jati hai wahan 18multyply 4- 72 mark ka effect puchhane ki chiz hai kya?
Dusari baat, omr sheet ki hera-feri agar hui bhi hai toh exam cancel karne ki jarurat hai kya? Forensic report me Jo omr positive paye gaye hain unhe alag karo aur baki ka result as it is rakho. Dhandhalibajon ko seperate karne ke baad exam cancell karne ki kya jarurat hogi? Kahate hai ki nyaya ka usul hai, hajaro apradhi chhut jaye par ek nirparadh ko saza nahi milni chahiye, yahaan 10-15 dhandhalibajon ke liye court hazaron niraparadhon ko saza kaise de dakti hai. jago bssc lawyer and reply in the court properly otherwise thousands of successful candidates ki mehanat cancellationist ki bhent chadh jaayegi.

Nilesh said...

Checking of all copies of mains examinee is more costly and time taking. I thing committee has ordered to check some of the suspective copies and its report is positive. So, proper checking of all copies is difficult and time taking.

jag said...

Nilesh bhai
Ur point is its time taking & costly, is it more time taking than re- exam & result, is it costs more than precious time of thousands of innocent students & their honest labour? It is a trap of cancelletionist( cancellation specialist) where court is going to fall.

jag said...

Aur haan .....sari copy check karne ki jarurat bhi nahi, dhandhalibaj ki pitai karo wo khud bak denge ki unhone kin roll no ka thika liya tha? Mujhe lagta hai bssc hi nikammi nahi, iske wakil sahab bhi ......take ser bhaji take ser khaja lagte hain.

deepak bhattacharya said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
deepak bhattacharya said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
deepak bhattacharya said...

wah kya baat hai JAG bhai ji,kya baat bolie.....pehli baat jitne bhai merit se main exam pass kye hai woh log apna apna chapal lai kar...bssc kai Chairman and the Secretary ko char char chapal marie aur ye baat poochie ki PT EXAM ke baad strongroom ke tala tutne aur omr sheet me cherchar ke matter KE BAAD JO STUDENT PAKRIE GAI THIE KISH BASIS PAR MAIN EXAM DAINE DIYE + MAIN EXAM MAI PASS KIYE...2SRI BAAT BSSC KE KAUN KAUN SE STAFF ISHMIE SAMIL THIE JINO NE 4-8 LAKH LAI KAR.... strongroom ke tala tutne and omr sheet me cherchar ka matter me samil thie...ooshie suspend kyu nhi kya

Nilesh said...

Jag Bhai @10:01AM

It is absolutely correct that innocent candidates' honest labour is more precious than any amount. And the way, you've suggested regarding officials of BSSC is under process. Every one is agree about this. As we're only the fortune seers, May god keep his bamboo on the back, who made such a crime.
Thanks

XXX said...

SA Exam has now lost all it's SANCTITY since the very INTEGRITY of BSSC's Chairman and it's Staffs has become doubtful. It is difficult to say how many BLACK SHEEPS are there in the Merit List. Nothing but cancellation of this exam is the only way out.

Unknown said...

Hum to pahle se hi kah rahe the ki dal me kala nahi balki puri dal kala hai. Court ne pt me phatkar tha ki itni galti kyo hua, us samay bssc ne galti mante hue kaha ki dubara nahi hoga. lakin jo bhai saheb 10 lakh dekar aya tha kya karta , so phir dhandly karke unhe bachaye rakha. Why not clear the cut off mark of 11000 students, they have been passed in additional result. Arbo ka khel kiya gaya hai, kisi ne kaha hai ki each student per 15 lakh ka thaka hua hai. Therefore , it is biggest scam in the competitive exam. This is bad game with fair students. so Court must take action and cancel the whole exam. yah to nahi chalega ki jo galti kiya hai use rad kar do, kaise koi kah sakta hai ki kaun fair hai ya kaun unfair.

jag said...

Santosh Kumar ji
Maine fair - unfair ko alag karne ka tarika pahale hi bata diya hai . Jahan tak " one more chance " ki chchahat rakhanewalon ki baat hai , toh main yahi kkahunga ki apne options dekhate raho....karan agar HC cancell karegi , mamla SC me jaayega . JE 2006 ki tarah SC re- instate karegi. Tab safal bhai toh set ho jayenge aur baki ye gana gayenge......give me some sunshine,give me some rain, give me another chance , I waana grow up once again......

Nilesh said...

Brother,

Ab to yeh sab jaan gaye hain ki BSSC ke do answer

1. Jo usane pahle jari ki thi (Jisake hisab se merit list bani hai) aur

2. Jo baad me signature ke saath jari ki thi (Jiske anusar merit list aana abhi baki hai)

In dono answer list me 13 questions ka difference hai. Isake anusar abhi merit banana baki hai kyonki agar signed answer se merit jari nahi kiya gaya to naya petition to court me jana tay hai. To abhi to revised merit list ani baki hai to kisi ko asafal kaha to wahi baat hogi jaise facebook pe safal logo ka alag se account khulna. I think revised merit list will be on website within a week to avoid further petition in court. Individualy mere marks me 36 nos ka difference aa raha hai purane aur naye result ke anusar.You can also check your nos with revised result. Please don't apply on heart because mai to kewal wahi kah raha hu jo BSSC ke answer kahwa rahe hain.

Unknown said...

sorry santosh kumar ji ....
santosh ji ko lagta hai ki jitne bhi student merit list mai us se aage hai woh 10 lakh dekar aaya hai.. Arbo ka khel kiya gaya hai...
santosh ji aapka rank kitna hai ??... is arbo ke khel mai aap pichhe kiyo rah gaye??

sanjay verma said...

Dear friends it is not difficult to cheek all copy because technology is very fast now-a-days
for example bssc ne 27000 ke copy srif 2 days se kam me jari kar diya tha 4 th revised answer diya aur 6 ko result .high court ko all 3280 ke merit list jo ki coulselling kra chuke hai unka fornsik jach ka order de so that inside bubbling by bssc and outside bubbling by setters can be find out and into out side the merit list for judicial inquiry.
also to removed all wrong question which is not possible to retifed.and some question must be requied to give the double answer after set up expert commettee so that natural justice with all student .

jag said...

Comment @ 03:26
He bhagwaan ye sabjbaag kisne dikhaya aapko!!! Bahut confusion hai bhayiaaa.......ek gana yad aaya ....aayegi jarur chithhi mere nam ki Sab dekhana. Aisi koi list nahi aayegi mai-baap.

Nilesh said...


Dear Brother @4:13

Do Chitthi aa chuki hai mere naam ki aur mai use padh bhi chuka hoon. Filhal yahan Hajaribagh me dusari padh raha hu. Ghar ki chitthi thi to thoda jyada dhyan se padh raha tha. Sabjbaag dekhna meri aadat hi nahi hai mai to kewal BSSC ka majaak dekh raha hu. Achcha aap hi confirm bata do kya usi merit list pe vacancy close ho sakti hai? Tab to fir signed result ka koi value hi nahi rah jayega. Aur Govt. office me signature ka kya matlab hota hai ye saayad aap mujhse jyada jante honge. Mai to aise bhi kewal kuch posts ko dekh kar apply kiya tha. God knows aap merit me hai ki nahi, aur agar is fake list hai to mai aapke liye yahi kahoonga "RAB KARE TUJHKO BHI PYAR HO JAYE"

XXX said...

''....karan agar HC cancell karegi , mamla SC me jaayega''. At last, EVEN YOU are thinking that this exam might be cancelled.@Jagji.

XXX said...

Nileshji @3.26 Aap apni bat spast rup se kahe. Abhi jo merit list website par hai, wo apke anusar kis answerkey par aadharit hai?

XXX said...

Homework to be done by BSSC before 20th March~ {1} Giving authentic text- book proof in support of it's stand on 18 controversial questions.{2}Ensuring presence of it's Experts before the Court. {3}Telling the Court the impact of deletion of 18Q on the result.{4}Justifying it's stand on the issue of conduction of this exam by BCECEB.

jag said...

Of course bliss ji ...that will be agenda of 20 march.let's wait patiencely. Kuchh bhi ho sakta hai....

Nilesh said...


Dear Bliss,

As you're already aware that BSSC had published two answers
1. on 25.02.13 (with merit list)
2. on 01.03.13 (with signature)

In my set I got 13 questions are different from previous answer. If it is asked to BSSC in court, what is the value of your signed answer? If there is no merit list according signed answer. H'ble court had too asked about the effect on merit list after deletion of 18 questions. No any commission can disorder the High court. In personal, I don't want to cancel the examination but fresh merit list.
Thanks

Unknown said...

JSSC NE SA KA RESULT JARI KR DIYA HAI

Indian said...

kya aaplogon ko aisa lagta hai(setB,C,D wale bhaiyon)ki in seton me kuchh questions ke answer ya question ka serial no. change kiya hai perhaps answer ka order hi badal diya hai agar meri baat samjhe hain to plz reply....mere sath aisa teen question me hua hai ki maine sahi ranga tha lekin ab wo galat show kar raha hai

Unknown said...

is samay lagta hai ki sab ka dimag gadbad ho gaya hai.bhai sahab pahali bar answer 28.01.13 ko jari hua tha.is per aptti mangi gayi thi.result ke bad 25 feb ko marks jari hua tha.1 march ko revised answer jari hua tha.sab ek se badhkar ek vidwan hai.koi 18 galti khoj lata hai. koi 22.waise galtiyan 6 ya 5 h0 sakti hai. judge se wakil sab pareshan.ayog se lekar student tak sab pareshan.bhad me jaye aisa exam aur bssc. mitron bal ki khal na nikale to behtar hoga. app sabhi mitron se vinamra nivedan hai ki 18 Q jo galat hai ek bar mujhe dikha de.



Unknown said...

sabhi ko apna haque hai case ladne ka .sab log jo yaha points de rahe hai unhi ko adhar banakar alag alag case karen aur pure jindagi maja le. wakai ratish sir ne bahut achha platform diya jahan mihir jha ji se bade judge faisla sunane ke liye bhare pade hain.dinu kumar jaiso ki to kami hi nahi hai. jisko jab man karta hai blog per kabhi is prashna ko to kabhi us prashna ko galat sabit karane lagta hai.mana ayog ki galti hai per itani bhi nahi ki her koi uske expert se vidwan ban jaye. bura lage to maf kar dena, doston .per apne gireban me ek bar jarur jhanko.





Unknown said...

well said Sanjay ji ... maja aa gaya...

Nilesh said...

dear vidwan bhai,

Jara 25.02.13 ke answer, jisase merit list bani hai aur 01.03.13 ke signed answer me se set A ka (jo ki jyada clear hai) question nos. 5,8,21,69,82,88,97,98,111,119,123,144 aur 145 ke answer tally karao aur apana judgement pass karo. Kya itana antar kafi nahi hai merit list changing me. ye to ekdam samne hai. re-exam kaun chahta hai but merit list kiske anusar honi chahiye 25.02.13 ke answer ke anusar ya 01.03.13 ke anusar.

Thanks

deepak bhattacharya said...

DOSTO YE SONG AAP SAB KE LIYE....

nafarat ki laathi todo, laalach ka khanjar phenko
zidd ke peechhe mat daudo, tum prem ke panchhi ho
desh premiyon, aapas mein prem karo desh premiyon ...
dekho, ye dharati, ham sab ki maata hai
socho, aapas mein, kya apana naata hai
ham aapas mein lad baithe to desh ko kaun sambhaalega
koi baahar wala apane ghar se hamein nikaalega
deewanon hosh karo, mere desh premiyon ...

XXX said...

Nilesh bhai .....So far BSSC has uploaded two anskerkeys. First anskerkey on 28.01.13 and the second revised anskerkey on 01.03.13. The present Merit List (uploaded on 06.02.13) is based on the second revised answerkey of 01.03.13.That is all.

jag said...

Nilesh bhai ....Aapki jid dekhakar mujhe bhi past me jakar dekhana para. I reached on same conclusion. 29 Jan ko first ans list nikali. 31 Jan tak suggested ans mange Gaye. 04 fab ko ans revise kiya gaya aur 13 question ke revised ans ke aadhar par 06 fab ko result de diya gaya. Wahi revised ans sheet o1 march ko net par jari kar diya gaya. Ye ranking list 01 march ki revised ans sheet par hi toh based hai. Pls have a glass of cold water & then think again calmly my friend.

XXX said...

@sanjayaji ..... There are not 18 wrong questions but 18 controversial questions.

XXX said...

... maja aa gaya...Swetankji keep enjoying.

Nilesh said...

Dear Jag,
My confusion is yet to be cleared. Please explain
1.List we've got from website was on 25.02.13.
2. Signed answer was on 01.03.13 after merit.

I've throughly checked the answer received on 01.03.13 with previous one and found 13 differences. Then what is the mean of signed answer (of 01.03.13). Whether any list appeared according this or not. May be possible I've no information regarding this. It is just a question if you've answer then please tell.

Nilesh said...


You need not to explain if answer of 01.03.13 is the answer of 06.02.13. Lekin yaar 01.03.13 ke anusar mera number kuch aur hona chahiye. Agar ye sirf mere saath hai to koi baat nahi. Lekin ye ho sakta hai aur dusaron ke saath bhi ho. I'm still rigid that my number is different from this list. Evenafter, 0 marks for deleted question. Lets see what court interprets. I have to go Patna within this month and will find clear information regarding this mess.

jag said...

Nilesh ji....25.02.13 ko koi list nahi nikli. Wo councelling se related Information thi. See also blissji@ 10:29pm

Unknown said...

Swetank suman ji, Pahli baat to maine kisi ka nam nahi liya hai ab tak blog per , I have never told that every passed student is unfair. As per there is question of unfair, I can say with proof that lot of unfir happened in main exam. if u dont feel like this , pl tell me how? court have objected, I have not alleged anything on bssc. If u succeed in final result , mere taraf se badhai hai. Dont worry about me , i m also doing the job last four years in MoD hqrs in Kolkata. So I m not blaming any fair passed student. Pl try to understand , Bribe 10 ka ho ya 10 lakh ka ho, Pap pap hai. Thanks.

Unknown said...

Santosh ji plz elaborate this statement of yours
" I can say with proof that lot of unfir happened in main exam "

let us also know Lot Of Unfair...

Till date i only belive that only mistake happened in mains is wrong answer key... plz put some light on my/our ignorance...

Unknown said...

My friend Swetank jee, I try to satisfy u, before main exam some guidence had been given to bssc. Only 1415 additinal result have to give. But what happend. 11000 additional result has been published without assuring court.this is also offence. Secondly, without finishing the charge against the filling omr sheet after exam, main exam has been taken so fast, and publishing the result under one week. This shows the doubt in my opinion. Bssc has not cleared the cut off mark til date of additional result. What"s your opinion about this. This result will not clear till 2014. This is completely related to vote bank. Thanks my dear.

XXX said...

Tomorrow hearing of this Case should be completed and some Judgement is very much expected. But this matter will linger on for some time more.If the Case is dismissed ,the Petitioners will surely go to the Double Bench and then the SC. If the Exam is cancelled , BSSC will go to the Double Bench and then the SC. So INTJAR KI DHARIYA ABHI SAMAPT HONE WALI NAHI HAI.

Nilesh said...

Dear Brother,
Do you think BSSC will go for court? Then what will he explain about 11000 additional result, OMR sheet, Strong room etc. and yes why didn’t he show all students’ marks as he previously did in prelims exam, till now. What is the original cut off of prelims etc. If and only if BSSC declares all student marks with their copies and answer sheet as he did in past, then he will loose many of the points in court. Since court verdict is pending just watch and enjoy a lot.

Good Night

jag said...

Cancellitioniston ki ek baat mujhe samajh nahi aati, 11000 extra ka Rona. Sher kabhi nahi kahata ki mere saamane 200dogs ka jhund kyon tha ,100 ka kyon nahi? Wo toh bus fad deta hai, aaplog kyon rote ho ki 27000 kyon ho Gaye ,16000 kyon nahi rahe. Are champion lakh ko bhi pachhadkar apni seat le leta hai. Ye 11000 thousand ka Rona rone waale tab kahan the jab mains liya ja raha tha. Tab kyon nahi court case kia? Isse mansha saaf jhalakti hai wo kya chahate hain....par ek sher hai purana....muddai lakh bura chahe kya hota hai, wahi hota hai Jo manjure khuda hota hai.

samyaksai said...

well said, jag ji. i fully agree with you..ab dekhe kal kya hota hai. kitne candidates ke dilo ki dhadkan tej ho gayi hogi. ab sab kuch Mihir baba ke upar hai

XXX said...

Aj facebook par sabhi KHUDA ko yad kar rahe hai. KHUDA KYA CHAHTE HAI KISE PATA. APNI ICHCHA KO KHUDA PAR NA THOPE. Just be NEUTRAL and watch events with a DETACHED MIND.

jag said...

Jssc me jinka nahi hua wo bhi gadbadi ki aashanka jatane lage hain. Fail hote hi aadmi sandehwadi kyon ban jata hai ? Wo apni Kami na dekhkar system me Kami kyon dhundhane lagta hai? ....bura Jo dekhan mai chala bura na milta joy, Jo dil Khoja apana mujh sa bura na koy.....

XXX said...

Hearing might have started at 10.30 am.

XXX said...

Cancellationist , Reevaluationist, Dismissalist ......aj sab ki bolti band hai.

bikram said...

@jag, sher sher hi rahta hai, chahe ek bar reexam ho ya dus bar, ye bat savi log jante hai, to phir anap-snap kyo post karte hai. Aapke post se lagta hai ki Aap kafi tension me hai, tension na le aur court ke decision ko accept kare.

XXX said...

Aj facebook par TENSION ka para kaphi charha hua hai. Sabhi ulta-pulta bayanbazi kar rahe hai. Lagta hai RE-EXAM ke bhaya se dimagi santulan hil gaya hai.

jag said...

Bliss ji ne kah diya to bolti band hi rakhni hogi. Evening me bol-bachhan karenge. Gyies keep close watch on court hearing. Cancelletioniston ki hearing kal hai shyad.

XXX said...

Hearing kal hone ki khabar aa rahi hai. Details awaited.

SAGAR 3070 said...

please update todays position of the case in patna high court

Nilesh said...

Well said Jag Bhai,

Ab aaj dekha jaaye kya manjoor-e-khuda hota hai

Thanks for making blog light

sanjay verma said...

Any one having detail about today hearing please share it .If any one please update. thank in
advance

Unknown said...

Sannata bahut kuchh kah raha hai. pl, if any body has information about today hearing, share with us. Jo bhi Court ka adesh hoga sabko manna chahiye.

Unknown said...

aaj hearing nahi hui, petitioner ne kal ka date le liya.

Unknown said...

kyon kal ka date liya koi batayega? pahle bssc date mang rahi thi ab dinu ji bhi mangne lage..wah holi ki badhai. rang barse bhige chunar wali....khye gori ka yar...

jag said...

Arunjay ji...kya source of Information and reason of postponement bataayen.is bar holi kaun manaayega, clear Karen.

jag said...

It seems controvertialists aur cancellationists ek saath ho Gaye hain aur bssc par kal milkar attack karenge.

Unknown said...

dono side dwara prastut ans ek hi tha.new merit list wale baat per bssc ne kaha ki jab Q/A galat nahi hai to hatane ki jarurat nahi. ant me 1yy2 q ko hatane se merit list aprabhawit hai. dinu ji ke pas iska ans nahi tha,atah ek date mangi ,ek naya shigufa khojenge. bssc case jitegi aisa cuort room me maujood mitra ne bataya.

deepak bhattacharya said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
XXX said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
XXX said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
XXX said...

...
dono side dwara prastut ans ek hi tha.@Sanjayaji... It means both the Petitioners and the BSSC are saying that~(1) The longest beach is located in both TN and Goa. (2)DNA FINGERPRINTING is not related with DNA Recombinant technology.(3)Fishes do not swim in water.(4)Q.no. 147 need not be deleted...........and so on. No this is not possible. If your information is true, then WHAT THE PETITIONERS ARE FIGHTING THIS CASE FOR ?

jag said...

Wah Kumar sanjay ji...thanx for so fast & clear information. We expect the same response tommorow too from u. So pls don't forget to comment.

XXX said...

facebook par TENSION ka para girne ka nam nahi le raha hai. Re-exam ke dar se Ulta-pulta bayanbazi abhi bhi jari hai. Aap sabhi khud hi dekhe.....(1)Kuamr Sanjay said......aj court me bssc ne apna paksh majbuti se rakha.kaha ki koi sawal ya uttar galat nahi hai. expert dwara banaya gaya ans sahi hai ab isme koi change nahi hoga.1 ya 2 sawalon se merit listper koi prabhav nahi pad raha hai.yaha tak ki petitioner dwara diye gaye ans aur ayog dwara diye gaye ans me anter nahi tha.tab kaha gaya ki yaha ans kuchh bolte hai aur omr me rangte kuchh aur hai. aaj faisla ho jata per kuchh naye point ki khoj hetu date mang dinu ji ne,varna unki bolti band ho gayi thi. yah baatmanoj ji ne batai haimobile per. jai mata di.....(2)Amarendra Kumar said......
HC ne bssc ko 18/3 tak apna g affidavit court me jama karane ka samay diya tha aur isi ke adhar per hearing date 20/3 ko rakhi gayi thi,per bssc ne 18/3 ko apna affidavit submit nahi kiya,bssc ne aaj apna affidavit court ko diya,isliye hearing ke date ko aage kal tak badana pada.

Unknown said...

Kumar Sanjay kuch galatfahmi pal rakhe hai. Isliye galat-salat blog aur facebokk batakar apna frustation nikal raha hai. Darasal bssc is still not ready with its response. Due to Cancellation of JE exam (which is imminent), BSSC hasn't any reply of omr sheet bungling. It has no defence on that matter. And tommorrow both matter (OMR and mains 18 questions deletion) will be heard. Chances of cancellation is high. Kumar Sanjay jaise log pehle to bata rahe the case hua hi nahi hai. Aise me unnki frustation par dhyan dene ki jarurat nahi hai. Tommorrow both case is listed. See the cause list of 21-03-2013.

Unknown said...

Tomorrow all cases of OMR sheets forgery related to all bssc examination (Secretariat Assistant, Junior Engineer, Enforcement Directorate etc) are listed. Hence if JE exam is cancelled, then all examination will be cancelled. Economic intelligence wing will submit its inquiry and fir's. Hence mains exam will be heard latter, if pt survives.

jag said...

Bliss ki ye baat sahi hai q 111 & 147 ka ans change karna hi hoga board ko, ye ans dono paksh ke same nahi ho skate, jk bhai ne bhi thik kaha ki bssc ne 18march ko affidavit na dekar aaj diya hoga, Kumar sanjay ki bhi ye baat sahi hai ki in 2 or 3,questions ka ans change karne se merit par koi prabhav nahi padega. Aaj court ne 18 question ka deletion effect toh dekh hi liya hoga. Ab HC se ummid hai deletion effect par aur apna samay batbad na kar re-evaluation ke asli mudde par aa jaayegi.

Unknown said...

exam to cancel nahi hoha bahiyo 101% sure jaha tk bssc ko gali dene ka sawal h to wo kal pata chaj jayega aur baar baar safal logo ko fir se re-exam m fight karne ko kahne wale ye dhyan de ki jo tez h wo to nikal gaye baaki aap logo ka rashta aasan ho gaya bihar k upcoming vacancy k liye har har baar asafal hone par har baar dhandli ka aarop har baar re-exam yahi chata h angoor nahi mile to khatte h aur result rahta to bssc imandar hoti 11000 result ka sawal mains k pahle kyo nahi utha kyo ki abhi cancellation ka halla karne wale ko laga ki ek baar fir s galti se paas kar jayenge agar re-exam hua

«Oldest ‹Older   1001 – 1200 of 4922   Newer› Newest»